| FlamingWeazel said: They run them fine, one just runs them better then the other......dumb thread sorry. If you want graphics like PC, consoles would be 800 bucks.
There is no DEBATE x1 is significantly weaker, and tomb raider is not a last year game it has major enhancements like treessfx that are very demanding. please. nonsense.
The x1 might have an issue but ps4 doesn;t |
Amazing how when the X1 is worse at something, no matter how small, its a huge deal, but when PS4 can't do 1080p at 60fps - which I think EVERYBODY expected to be the standard for next gen on all systems at all times, being as we are moving into a 4K situation over the next 5-7 years, starting right now - then suddenly you don't care and handwave the discrepancy.
If you care enough about graphics to moan about res drops to 900p during some cut scenes on Xbox 1, why don't you care enough about them to wonder why the PS4, supposedly so advanced, can't play a year old PC game at HD standard 1080p/60fps? It certainly doesn't bode well for the future.
4K is going to have a tipping point soon and the facts are clear already that neither of these two new home consoles can pump 4K polygons. Maybe 4K video playback. But never games. Which effectively makes them NOT future proof. Which makes their existence seem odd. Another year before launch with beefier specs will start to look like the right choice in retrospect, I have a feeling.
