By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Million said:
El Duderino said:
Garcian Smith said:
Faxanadu said:


 


So does better graphics and sound equal higher quality ??? Or exellence ??? No not at all, whats quality and exelence in a videogame ??? Whatever it is I doubt you couldn´t find it in the NES or SNES era.

I never sayed gaming went downhill after the 90s, I´m just saying it didn´t get that much better, sure new exciting things have been done, but did they make the video game experiance that much better ??? Are kids today having more fun than kids back then ??? Games are ment to be fun, challenging and entertaining, how can you say games today are more fun challenging or entertaing that back in the 90s ???

If quality is graphics and shaders then I could make a picture of my butt and say it has more quality than the Mona Lisa, but thats just not true (unless you really like my butt :)

 

 

This gen doesn't only have superior Graphics and Sound , the games also have better AI , Depth , Life , Replay Value , Multyplayer value , Value in general than they ever did. Like I said before calling 90's titles quality by 90's standard is acceptable , that was their era , their time to shine . This is 2008 dude Super Mario Bros is only "quality" because of the standard it overcame in it's time , if that game had never been created until 2008 I bet it wouldn't even had got past the board room.

 


 As I sayed before, do the superior graphics, sound, AI (which still sucks in most games) and multiplayer value make the games more fun, challenging or entertaining ??? I don´t think so... Oh and how can you say games now have more depth, life and replay falue ??? That is a very subjective thing to say and I don´t agree at all...