| DonFerrari said: People complaining about Street Fighter re-releases with minor DLCs added... It's not even close to Annual CoDs, Fifas (and all other sport games) and the like, they are all the same game for basically 5 years with minute improvements and added chapters/players... all of them could be made as DLC, but won't because 60 for each sale is better than 20... and mandating people buy new one or be out of MP is really effective and dirty. |
i see where you are coming from. I dont think people complain too much about Street Fighter proper. That is one of the few things Capcom got right IMHO. the original release was fine. then the did the Super thing, but it was cheaper and IMO way better. every subsequent "release" was just an add on, one didnt NEED to buy it unless they didnt own the Super edition and even then. its only 30 bucks. Cant see how you wouldnt want that. The problem with Capcom is they didnt extend this to the other fighting games. Mvs.C3 got a definitive edition announced for cheaper about 2 months after the game came out and was released months later. That pissed me off as i could of just waited for a cheaper better version. SFxTekken was just a clusterfuck of greed. 12 characters locked behind a paywall? 360 version terribad? Its crazy cause the game itself is actually good. Im just glad i have Vita so I could (ironically) get the best version of the game.
As for COD, i dont think the last part is true. I suspect you will still find plenty of people playing the old games, its not like they just stop playing them al together when a new one is out, but if it makes you feel better its starting to decline.
