Nintendo's Achilles heel?

[Player2]

trixiemafia86 said:

Player2 said:

 

No. They must do new things, but not the things everybody else is making. Nobody who likes M-rated games (or a very small amount of them) is going to pick up a Nintendo console to play the 2-3 games Nintendo would make, specially when those games rain 24/7 on the PS and Xbox.

Not a very good idea when said games are expensive to make.

Goldeneye was made 17 years ago, when FPS were scarce on the dominant console (PS1), probably because the default PS1 controller didn't have analog sticks. Things have changed a lot since then.

A game like AC for instance is unique, Last of US, Gears, Watchdogs, Infamous, these are all unique. Just because they look realistic does not mean they look the same. Now where's Nintendos offering? Mario/Zelda is NOT new things but they keep making them hoping things will change.

They cater to the same audience. M-Rated, realistic looking, violence. That's why TLoU failed to move a significant amount of hardware. A 4M seller exclusive that failed to put PS3 over X360 in NPD in its launch month.

Nintendo should aim for something more efficient, or they'll bleed even more.