Garcian Smith said:
Then you're defining "best" as something other than what "best" clearly means. Take a basic game - say, on the SNES - and layer a few new and interesting concepts on it, and improve the graphics and sound, and why exactly don't you end up with a better game than the original? @ Kasz216: Seriously? I mean, I'm as big of an Earthbound fan as the next guy, but the SNES simply wasn't capable of many of the things that we see in modern RPGs. I mean, could the SNES handle something as complex as Vagrant Story, let alone a modern RPG like Oblivion? |
Who died and made you king of definitions ??? You don´t get a better game by adding better graphics and sound... is Crysis better than Half Life 1 ??? Is Lair a better game than Star Fox... would the Mona Lisa be better if da Vinci had had a digital camere with 10 billion pixels ??? Hell No !!! It´s what you do with the resources you have not the resources themself... if someone came from the future and let you play a game on his PS9, sure it would blow you away from a graphics and sound point of view... but graphics and sound only go so far, if the game gets boring after ten minutes or is just another copy of games we know today it will be bad, not better.








