Million said:
El Duderino said:
Onyxmeth said:
kenzomatic said:
Garcian Smith said:
Anyone who says anything other than 6th or 7th is succumbing to nostalgia. |
And Citizen Kane sucked because it was in black & white. (sarcasim) |
Completely different scenario. You can't compare movies and games in that way. Games are an expanding technology. Movies could be at their prime the moment a camera was first used to show them. The only thing time has given us in movies is color and special effects. The acting has been around since the 1930's. It has changed drastically from yesteryears to today but I can find as many slam dunk performances back then as I can now. I say the 70's gave the best performances ever, and no amount of Michael Bay or Gore Verbinski slap happy effects movies will ever change that.
|
Acting has been around since the 1930s ??? MUAHAHAHAHA !!! Have you ever been to a real theatre ??? I´m just messing with you, I know what your saying but still, the coparison is legit. Games like Tetris and Super Mario Brothers the Legend of Zelda, are still among the best games ever made, does it matter how many pixles and colors they had ??? I´d even say the earn bonus points for beeing great eventhough they had limitations, often having limited resources forces us to be more creative... Citisen Cain will always be among the best movies, NES and SNES games will always be among the best video games, if you think otherwise you could argue Leonardo da Vinci made worse paintings than people today because he didn´t have the technology we use to make art with today... |
By today's standards Tetris and Super Mario are crappy games , my 7 year old bro wouldn't touch it , the public wouldn't buy it and anyone with half a brain would recognise how crappy they are. What your doing is comparing the games by the standard that was set in that era, hell with the tools availble to me now I could have made a legendary game , for that "era". |
By those standards chess is a crappy game.
