DialgaMarine said:
Samus Aran said:
DialgaMarine said:
Samus Aran said:
DialgaMarine said:
Samus Aran said:
DialgaMarine said:
Samus Aran said:
When are we going to see a game that looks much better than PS3 then? |
Shadow Fall?.. Battlefield 4?.. inFamous: SS?.. If you honestly think none of those games far surpass what's on PS3, then you've clearly played neither console.
|
It surpasses PS3, but not that much that I think the PS4 is 10 more powerful than PS3.
Battlefield is on PS3 lol. Sure, not as good graphics, but is the gameplay any different? I'm not paying 400 euros just for a difference in graphics.
|
Just a question of curiousity: Would you buy a Wii-U at $300 for SM3DW, when you can get, essentially, the same game (SM3DL) on 3DS at $170? I mean, if you think about one is just a bump up in graphics.
|
There's a huge difference between Super Mario 3D World and Super Mario 3D Land.
Besides, I never said I didn't care for graphics. Gameplay is just more important.
Owh, when I'm buying a Wii U it will be the Wii U bundle with Zelda: Wind Waker HD(never played Wind Waker on the GC). It's 289 euros in my country, so the Wii U only costs 230 euros for me. Just can't buy it right now, too busy with university and not enough cash.
Ps: I didn't like Super Mario 3D Land!
|
So, there's a huge difference between 3D Land and 3D World, but not so much between Killzone: SF and Killzone 3? What's the major difference in gameplay between 3DW and 3DL, that makes it so much more significant than KZSF and KZ3? No offense, but that sounds more like a bias than anything.
|
Play both games and you'll find out why Killzone is just one of the many mediocre FPS games out there and Super Mario 3D World is actually quite a gem. Especially when you play it with 4 people which you can't on Super Mario 3D Land.
That's not bias. It's clear which game took more effort and talent to develop.
|
You are aware that 3DW was originally in development for the 3DS, but was ported over to the Wii-U so the console could finally recieve a genuine AAA game. I'm sure we could go back forth all day about Killzone, but you've obviously never played the franchise, so it doesn't matter. You're opinion about either kindof becomes mute at that point. Point is the Wii-U is no more of step forward from it's predecessor than the PS4 is, but you'll buy it in a heartbeat while you try to down the PS4. PS4 games will be leagues ahead of PS3 in the next couple years, even though some already are. All you have to do is compare launch exclusives and there's no contest. Just the truth.
|
If you actually read my posts you'd realize I said multiple times that PS4 games in the future will look much better. I didn't bring up the Wii U, some Sony fan did because he tried to attack me after seeing my name. I'm talking about the current PS4 games compared to the latest PS3 games. If the PS4 is really 10 times more powerful you'd expect those games to look much better despite being launch titles.
I have played Killzone by the way, it just isn't very good. And Super Mario 3D World was never in development for the 3DS. There's not a single source on the internet supporting your little theory lol.
Besides, one would only have to look at the review scores of both games to know that this is not a contest at all. KZ: SF has a Metacritic score of 73(and a user score of 7.2) while Super Mario 3D World has an average review score of 93(and a user score of 8.9).
