By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
FlamingWeazel on 26 January 2014
Edit Thread
iceboy151 said:
oldschoolfool said:
iceboy151 said:
FlamingWeazel said:
iceboy151 said:
I don't understand why people are so against having multiplayer added in games. Adding it to The Last of Us didn't seem to hurt the game, neither did it hurt Tomb Raider. Or other games like the Uncharted series. I would love if they created a multiplayer component the right way. Even if it did suck, you don't have to play it.


Crteating a online component takes a lot of time and resources, taking dev time away from what is a way better SP game. User created content and replayability > MP for infamous.


Look at the games I just listed, did it take anything away from those games? Any game can have multiplayer, as long as its done right. 


why add it,just for the sake of adding it? That's what they seemed to do with tomb raider. Sure it did'nt take away from the single player,but it just seemed like a waste of time and resources. 

To give the game longevity. After you beat a game what's left to do?


Half the games powers are unaccessible depending on your karma, there is user generated content that makes the replay value endless. Not to mention its open world nature therre is no way you will do everything on 1 play through, it's easy to miss many missions, items and power to collect..............