Onyxmeth said:
Bioshock doesn't have online multiplayer first of all. You would know that if your head wasn't stuck up Sony's ass and you had read up on Bioshock ever. Secondly in what way shape or form is Bioshock a watered down version? It runs on the same engine powering plenty of multiplayer titles like Stranglehold that end up just as mediocre on the PS3 as they are on the 360. Also the comment "better free online gaming" makes no sense since Microsoft doesn't offer free online gaming, thus you can't compare the two "free" services. Microsoft offers a better service that you pay for vs. a weaker PS3 service you don't pay for. Also I would love to see if you feel Achievements are still gimmicky after Sony creates their own version later this year. If they're so gimmicky then why would Sony want to have a competing scoring system? Also about Bungie, if they asked to buy themselves back out of Microsoft and are still working with them like a first party, so obviously no hard feelings, why would you think they would jump from being independent to being a first party developer again? It was their choice to leave because they wanted more control. Also the Halo name is Microsoft's buddy. Bungie can't bring it anywhere. Sony could get a Project Origin out of Bungie probably, but I doubt we'll see that crazy scenario anytime soon.
|
Couldn't have said it better myself. +1 Onyxmeth
