globalisateur said:
The dev was talking about GPU metric. PS3 GPU has roughly 0.180TF when PS4 GPU has 1.84TF hence the 10 times more powerfull. But I agree with you that many games on PS3 look better than some PS4 games. Like many great looking PS3 games look better IMO than the blurry fest with uninspired artstyle Knack. And even TLOU, AC4(PS4) and Tomber Raider Definitive edition are all better looking than Killzone too even if Killzone is more technically advanced than those 3 former gamers. Killzone is too much cartoony, the excessive FXAA with temporal stuff creating nasty artifacts and adding a awful vaseline filter. All those games, Knack, Killzone, BF4 and COD with this strong FXAA applied are for me like some of the first PS3 games with this horrible Quincunx used. But games like AC4, Resogun, Tomb Raider DE and all the high resolution/low compression footage I have seen of Infamous, Dying light, DriveClub, Thief give me a lot of confidence for a bright PS4 future notably because none of those game use any cheap blurring AA. |
I agree that we'll be seeing much better looking games in the future. But if a developer says the PS4 is 10 times more powerful than the PS3, I want to see an extremely good looking game from him. And not what I've seen now. As of now, it just sounds like big talk. Put your words where your mouth is and prove it with an amazing looking game.
