kabamarutr said:
How many out of those games have you seen offered by PS+? Them being the exception on the norm, most games take a couple of days to finish. Thus, completing a circle to the argument, they are then rendered virtually garbage. So! I prefer not having to pay much for a 10-12 hour (have it your way) game which I will complete in 2-3 days and not touch again. PS+ is the ideal option for me - and many other it seems - as it offers me enough games to let me get by the month , while I have paid a single games worth 50$. I want need DmC again after I've finished it. Nor Hitman, Deus Ex, AC III, U3, etc etc. |
I'm sure its good for you, but you are not getting anything "free". And, i still say you only buy a certain type of game for you to say games are that short, unless you play them 24/7. Not even Uncharted or GoW are games i finish in 2 to 3 days. I guess it depends on the kind of marathons one does.
I hear PS+ defenders talk about it like its incredible and everyone should jump on it, completely disregarding that there are different styles of gamers. PS+ does not fit my gaming style and its also not cheaper. I buy games on the cheap one year after they come out. If i dont think i want to keep them i get about half of tham investment back. Not only that, but i choose wich games i get. Something that doesnt happen with PS+ (Sony chooses for you).
Tel me, do you even finish all the PS+ games you get? I know the answer, but i want to make it obvious to you. Good that it fits your gaming style. It doesnt mean that its the best choice for every gamer though.







