Microsoft Responds To 'Games With Gold' Not Being As Good As 'Playstation Plus'

[kabamarutr]

Nem said:

kabamarutr said:

Nem said:

kabamarutr said:
Games nowadays have, mostly, 6-8 hours worth of single player. After that, it's garbage to me. So, I prefer to keep my garbage digital and not have to pay a buckload for it, thank you very much. Rent it is, then, if rent is how some people call it.

I have a feeling you play FPS alot. Most games nowadays seem to have campaigns on the dozens of hours. 

Also, ever heard about reselling your stuff (wich you dont care about) and getting some money back?

I play little fps. Isn't GoW3 around 6-8 hours? Or even U3? 

Yes, I've heard about such a thing. But I don't like to get in the trouble. So... 50$ a year and all trouble is over.

Trouble? Do you mean you are too lazy to go to the shop to resell your games? Cause theres no legal troubles if thats what you meant.

About length yeah, Uncharted 3, GoW3 are about 10 hours long, but for example Assassins Creed, dozens of hours, GTA dozens, Skyrim hundreads, Fallout hundreads, JRPG's dozens, driving games dozens, mass effect dozens, etc.

Where I live, shops take any game back for 5$, be it AAA or an annual sports game that has no value once the year has come to pass.

How many out of those games have you seen offered by PS+? Them being the exception on the norm, most games take a couple of days to finish. Thus, completing a circle to the argument, they are then rendered virtually garbage.

So! I prefer not having to pay much for a 10-12 hour (have it your way) game which I will complete in 2-3 days and not touch again. PS+ is the ideal option for me - and many other it seems - as it offers me enough games to let me get by the month , while I have paid a single games worth 50$. I want need DmC again after I've finished it. Nor Hitman, Deus Ex, AC III, U3, etc etc.