By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Scizor_99 on 24 January 2014
Edit Thread
vivster said:
Scizor_99 said:
vivster said:
Scizor_99 said:
vivster said:
jlmurph2 said: 

Earlier today, we Monacelli also suggested that The Last of Us: Left Behind would beboth the first and last single-player DLC for the title.

So they can start quickly on a PS4 port, right? RIGHT?


Didn't they already say no to this?

I don't know. I don't see why they shouldn't do it. If not in the near future maybe in a few years.


Straight-up ports after only one year may be beneficial for the business but may hurt the brand. If they want to remake the game later then sure, but I don't think that mere modest updates are befitting of a Naughty Dog game.

Of course it will not just be upscaled to 180p but also newer and sharper textures added. I think it would be a great title for the early PS4 lineup for people who didn't own a PS3 or haven't yet tried it. I would buy it instantly since I only played through once when I rented it for 3 days.

A PS4 version would still be a great game, just without the eye cancer from last gen.


Is it that bad? The PS3 may be more than 7 years old but the graphics of The Last of Us are remarkable. I always thought that PS3 couldn't quite create realistic-looking charcters but Joel and Ellie almost fooled me sometimes. I would rather have it created ground-up for the PS4 - something that would be considered impressive for the system. 

I don't understand why people let the fact that a game is not running on the most powerful and up-to-date hardware substantially limit their enjoyment of a game. If you do that, you're only limiting yourself.