| Dark_Feanor said: When both were supposed to be 1080p/30 I realy suspected that the PS4 version would have some small advantages in effects, details and textures, probably at the same level we saw in NFS: Rivals and NBA2K. With the information we have I can suppose now the performance difference will be in line with the differece in hardware, 30 to 40% or 30-45 FPS vs 50-60 FPS. Any way, unlocked frame rate is not a good thing either at 30fps or at 60fps. |
What you probably don't know is that NBA2K on PS4 has 2XMSAA (maybe even 4XMSAA) when there is no AA at all on X1. Yes Digital Foundry conveniently forgotten to do a face-off with this game. But on screenshots I have seen on NBA2K thread at Neogaf it's obvious.
But I agree visually NFS versions are really close with slightly better AO and AA on PS4 but not really noticeable in-game.
Concerning TB they said it averages at 30fps with highs as 45FPS on X1. But why wouldn't they say 35FPS average if it's really 30-45FPS?
For me it's clear when PS4 version will sub-60FPS dips X1 version will logically sub-30fps dips. The most important is the average gap in-game, like the constant 10fps average gap easily seen on BF4 DF video (on top of the 44% resolution gap for BF4 of course). I predict many disappointment if we see a constant average 20-25fps gap between the 2 versions.
But I don't think we will see a constant 30fps average gap between the 2 versions, more like 20-25FPS which would be consistant with the on-paper specs of the machines.
