DirtyP2002 said:
Oh dear. Ethics does not play a part in their business strategy, because the gaming direction is not beneficial to the hardcore gamer. That is one crazy statement for a company that donates so much money on charity. Founded by the guy, who is collecting money from billionaires and raising 200 billion USD (!!!) for charity with "The giving pledge". But yeah, Ethics does not play a big role for them, because their gaming direction is not beneficial for the hardcore gamer.
Btw. I am a hardcore gamer, how is their "direction" (whatever this means) not beneficial to me? |
Okay...lol. You have no idea what "business ethics", means. Very good. Let's just move on to the gaming question you asked,later. Here's the thing about that term "Hardcore/True Gamer": as much as it's a perspective thing, there's an overall consensus on what a "Hardcore/True Gamer is.
About two months ago, one of the producers of the COD series admitted, with no shame, that their games aren't for "True Gamers". If the main reason Microsoft's console has moved so many units in the past was for that series, or that genre, that doesn't say who they're MAINLY selling this console to? Microsoft's reveal consisted of tv, NFL, &...COD Ghosts. This is VGChartz, don't take my word for it, check out sales of ANY COD on 360 to PS3. Such a large gap. Coming from the creators of the series that says their audience is not "Hardcore/True Gamers".
Again, the term is STILL anyone's opinion. But when the creator if that syatem's MAIN system seller, also the MAIN system to play that genre, is also having that view about his games, then...maybe you might need to open your perspective on games, a bit...







