Nintendo does not need a graphical successor to the U

[Rafux]

padib said:

Rafux said:

Nintendo just needs this *insert some dream I have about a future I can't predict*

Does what I said make sense at all to you?

If you didn't try to understand it, don't just jump in here with some generalization.

There are reasons that I've explained throughout the thread, more precisely saying that Nintendo's U strategy does not require a graphical upgrade.

HOWEVER, if they wanted to compete against Sony or MS, they would need a SECOND PILLAR.

Just read the thread or don't bother.

I read it and it was full of pipedreams, don't bother replying you are obviously one of those guys that can't accept the posibility of being wrong.