By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
PlayStationLegend on 21 January 2014
Edit Thread
bugrimmar said:
PlayStationLegend said:
bugrimmar said:
PlayStationLegend said:

Killzone 2 says hi! Best looking FPS at the time of release.

"Killzone 2 is perhaps the best looking FPS ever made" - Kevin Van Ord (GameSpot review).

Uncharted 2, War 3, MGS 4, Killzone 3, The Last Of Us etc. All graphically best looking games of their respective period of release.

NO Xbox 360 or Wii game comes close.

lol. have you seen the 'original' killzone 2 trailer, the one that Sony claimed to be running in 'real time'?

well if you haven't seen it, i suggest you go take a look at it. the difference between that and the final game itself is baffling.

it's not about how the graphics look right now. it's about what was originally promised. the cell was 'supposed' to created photo realism in every game. it did not deliver on that promise, not by a long shot. again, read what you just quoted from my post. kojima himself found the ps3's actual power to be very low compared to what was promised.

Let's not "unclassy" now. Game developers regularly show footage of a game running on different hardware or whatever. THAT Killzone 2 trailer is "still" debated as to whether the engine used for it was actually used for the game itself.

Shall I go along the lines of what Microsoft did last year? You know using PCS INSTEAD of Xbox One to showcase their games? No. I thought not.

Kojima says a lot of things. Most of which are worthless. Like how he said MGS was finished after IV. I wouldn't take his word seriously. Oh, wait. You did.

 

Moving on.....


Your responses show a clear lack of knowledge about the subject matter. Whether or not the original KZ2 was running on different hardware, it doesn't matter. The fact is, the actual game and the original trailer are miles apart. I'm talking about 1080p vs. standard definition different. This has nothing to do with 'different hardware'. The whole point of my post is that Sony promised sooooo much with its original trailer, and the final game was nowhere near. That shows that the developer couldn't reproduce the original in their final version.

Moreover, how do you say that Kojima's words are worthless, and then state how good the graphics are of MGS4? That's complete nonsense. Er, don't you realize that he makes almost all aspects of MGS? He simply stated that he wanted a lot more, based on the promises of Sony for PS3, and PS3 couldn't deliver on what he wanted, so he had to make MGS4 much lower than he intended it to be. How is that not serious? So what if he said MGS is finished after the 4th? That has nothing to do with this argument.

Again, my point is, SONY PROMISED SO MUCH, BUT FAILED TO DELIVER ON ITS PROMISE. I'm not saying that PS3 games look bad or anything like that. I'm merely stating that they didn't deliver on the promise, which was impossible to do anyway.

Since you obviously lack any knowledge on the subject, I will abandon this argument now. Seeing as you're new to the site, I hope you enjoy what Vgchartz has to offer.

I agree that Sony didn't deliver on the "1080p" promise. No doubt about that. They still delivered on the "best looking games" of the generation. Unique, immersive GOTY winners.  

Is there a game last gen that had the "scale" of War 3? The incredible set piece shoot outs of Uncharted 2 (the train level is astonishing from a design and structure perspective)? The attention to "detail" of Killzone 2? The epicness of the Mawlr boss fight in Killzone 3?

I rest my case.

Sony delivered on their promise. They didn't deliver "entirely" on it though.

P.S. Thanks. I'm enjoying vgchartz. : )