toastboy44562 said:
Muffin31190 said:
toastboy44562 said:
Muffin31190 said:
Yeah I believe you to very wrong OP, the Perfect counter example to this is the Dreamcast, a highly Quality console for the time with good amount of quality games and still low sales so yup. |
There isn't one game on the dreamcast that i think is remotely good. I wouldn't even play anything on there that was given to me for free. It's all subjective
|
Did you play any Games on the Dreamcast, because I feel like your missing out on a lot of great games. And a large part of the Gaming Community agrees that the Dreamcast was robbed of the glory it could have had because of the success of the PS2 (and the failed business practices of Sega).
And also Just because "you" dont see any appeal in the games does not make them have any less Quality to it and it doesnt make any of the games less memorable or Rated very highly among the gaming community.
ex: I think Call of Duty is a lame and repetative game but does that make the game have any less Quality, no there is tons of work and effort put into those games to make them as polished as possible to make a Quality game and it is enjoyed by many gamers.
|
Just because you and a 100 people on the internetz thinks the dreamcast is badass and hundreds of millions of people think it sucks doesn't make it a high quality imo. Unless you think that your opinion trumps everyone else's on the face of the planet. If it had high quality games and people liked the system it would have sold and it didn't. This means it isn't a high quality imo. people make rational decisions and if there is a substitute that's better (in this case ps2) people will buy that instead.
|
Agreed and IMO the dreamcast sucked hard as well as the other sega systems too except for maybe the genesis but that comparison towards the PS2 is a little unfair cause that system actually had relevant games LOL.
