And still, you missed the whole point of the topic, you just went out debating about 3rd party to catch a fight on '' fanboy/hater''.
You didn't delivery any solid argument to counter mine , still waiting for a solid one, with solid bases. I pointed before that you should consider a lot of things , not only combined sales, that is just stupid. Take a deep breath and read my argument again before turning around the point, we are not discussing "youre just a Nintendo hater for saying they may someday go third party" bandwagon? ( maybe we are , after what you said) but the real point : Let's consider another things, not only combined sales, before calling someone '' wrong''...
Oh ! by the way, I really didnt ask if you own all the major systems and handhelds, I really dont care at that, still, this does not make any sense in what are discussing here: Nintendo should go 3rd party.
Deal with it.
|
You will get an adequate response when you pose an argument that makes sense, refuting sales potential by claiming "you can't just add up the console figures" is nonsensical, as these figures would be directly relative to the situation, any money spent learning development cycles for other systems would be saved not having to produce and maintain their own SDK and development costs for their own system firmwares.
As such we are left with sales potential and that comes down to install bases, hence my post.
You say I missed the whole point of the topic, the topic which is giving rather flawed reasons why Nintendo should not go third party, I gave reasons why they financially could, do you not understand how debates work?
