superhippy420 said:
I dont see it. The general consensus about Knack was that it sucked, and Killzone is that its a decent game with great graphics.. Pretty much everything I have seen said Forza was solid, Dead Rising 3 was very good, and Ryse was a mediocre game with great visuals. Not to mention that Killer Instinct has been begged for by its fans for years on end, and they released that at launch too. You can have a different opinion, but that is why I feel like Xbox Ones exclusive lineup was much better, and it made no difference because last generation Call of Duty and FIFA moved all the consoles. Alot has been made of Nintendos 3rd party problems, but as of right now Sony and Microsoft are having the same 1st party problems. |
And this why that is an opinion and not a fact. As a matter of fact, there have been several threads made by people who have played Knack and claim that they had fun and that it by no means the terrible game that critics make it to be. Additionally, parents who have played it with their children have also said that it was great especially for the children. Again, quality is subjective. Feel free to express your opinion, but please refrain from making absolute statements such as "no doubt" and telling people that are wrong when they simply point out that what you're describing is "not a fact". Even if 90% of critics and gamers agreed with you, it still wouldn't be a fact and there most certainly would be doubt.
Also, better quality does not make a line up better for everyone. Say Resogun was released as a retail game and critics called it the best next generation retail game, but gamers didn't care for it, would Sony have the better line up? No, because those gamers are not interested in that game. I, for example, could not care less for Dead Rising, Forza and Killzone, so if a console had "terrible" games like Ryse and Knack, I'd consider buying that one instead.
