M.U.G.E.N said:
small44 said:
M.U.G.E.N said:
It's sony's responsibility to get them on board
On a somewhat better news some vita games have done better than I expected. Sly Vita 67k. KZ M over 100k
Tearaway 50k ..should have made an official bundle like in EU..but scea gonna scea
|
Sony make vita developer friendly it make it easy to develop and easy to port games from ps3 on it,game like Assasin Creed sold well on vita despite of the small install base i think it's enougth to attract third party.
If Nintendo first party can't save wii u ,Sony first party can't save Vita.
I don't think Sony first party support is bad on Vita i know first party game are from scej or scee not from scea but who care it still Sony.
|
Making it dev friendly is just the first step. It's thanks to that we are getting all these indie games. Sony's responsibility is to build a profitable market for those third parties because at the end of the day they are all business and money talks. Sony first party titles on the handheld front has no selling power even comparable to Nintendo ones. So what they needed to do was have 1-2 big third party IPs on board for the system. GTA, FF etc. We got no such exclusive.
SCEA treats the system like shit. No marketing. Not a single new first party exclusive announced in well over a year. If Sony themselves show lack of faith third parties will bail the fuck out too.
SCEE does a bit better and sales reflect that. SCEJA does a much better job and games and sales show that.
|
We got 4 good new IP Soul Sacrifice,Gravity Rush,Toukiden and Terraway we also got Killzone,Uncharted,Wipeout,lbp.
First party support to vita is better then psp support but 3rd party support on psp are a lot better then third party support on vita.
Take two and square enix don't want to develop on vita Sony can't do anything what make me angry at third party is that third party support more wii u then vita even when their game sold better on vita.
