fordy said:
fps_d0minat0r said:
fordy said:
fps_d0minat0r said:
good logic with the cat and dog, except im not sure where I said trophies were games, ive used the terms 'plus' and 'feature' a lot, so im disappointed you havent taken notice of that.
"You're saying that trophy collecting is just as enthralling as the game itself?"
no I did not say that, you pulled it out of youre arse like most other things you *think* I have said.
You still havent explained why you do such a trivial thing such as playing games. It bears no achievement and has been ridiculed much more than trophies.
you cant see that the same argument youre using against me to not approve of trophies is being used by millions of people around to world to not approve of games in general which is a shame on you.
The feelings are towards a hobby, not a company. I just pick sony consoles because they release the most exclusives in the genres of games I like.
|
So you're saying that just because you class them as an 'addition', they should be exempt from scrutiny because they differ from games, yet at the same time you're trying to put them on the same class as games themselves to ask why I play games but do not bother with trophies. Brilliant reasoning there! Your contradictions on the same post are becoming more and more frequent.
The reason for the outline of the logical argument was that you cannot make a logical implication based on factors if ALL factors are not taken into consideration, and that's where your argument still fails. If this is what you consider a logically sound argument, I could ask you the contrary, that since you do everything that bears no achievement and is ridculed, why aren't you out there sucking bile out of dead roadkill, or arranging stones in order of size or importance (please God don't tell me that you actually do those things...) since those also meet said requirements to make the same connection?
Do you see now why your argument makes absolutely no sense whatsoever, or are you just going all-out now without any regards for making yourself look even more ridiculous? Shame on who? The only shame that I might have is finding amusement at your failure to grasp simple logical implication...
I don't believe your last paragraph for a second. Why? Because your kneejerk reaction to the pic was to try and ridicule Nintendo fans, not the people who do not like achievements/trophies in general. You're trying to hide your initial agenda, but it can be clearly seen: you're trying to NOT pass yourself as a defender of a corporate entity, but the thread history shows otherwise. Nice try though; unlike you, I can remember the entire history of the post, where your performance has ranged from contradicting yourself from 3 posts ago, to contradicting youself on the SAME post, with some backpedalling in between...
However, I can see clear as day as to what you're TRYING to do; you're trying to find something on me that I'm interested in that you can attack, despite everything that you bring up 1. having absolutely NO relevance to the initial topic, 2. failing miserably for being off target, or 3. something that I wouldn't give a shit about. Incredibly amusing however, watching you take stabs in the dark like that. Each miss is only making you look all the more desperate, and highlights your failure to argue both on-topic, and with reasonable logical implication in regards to the topic.
|
You just sound silly when you talk about logic after writing such a long comment assuming games and trophies are mutually exclusive, and ignore the fact that in addition to collecting trophies, im still enjoying tons of great games of a wide variety, including multiplatforms, exclusives and indies.
Even if I side with the stupidity that its ok to compare trophies with games, I dont lose anything because I do both.
So once again, what is youre point?
If you want me to admit to something that makes you feel happy, just tell me and I will get this over and done with....and I will be furious if its something I already mentioned 10 comments ago and I have to requote it to you.
|
So here's the attempted defense, I see...
Show me where the pic, or the replies constituted as me saying that games and achievements were deemed mutually exclusive. It doesn't defeat the point at all. You wanted reasons, I gave reasons. You chose to ignore said reasons and now use a defense of "I can do both", like it constitutes any valid defense to the arguments raised. You're the one who brought games into this, while the initial criticism was squared directly at trophies/achievements, once again, from a pic that set you off way too far.
You apparently did lose something from it (most likely temper), after what was a small pic taking a shot at your "centralised achievements" comments was too much for you to contain. Once again, if you get off to trophies, I don't care, but that doesn't escape the fact that you took criticism of it WAY too personally.
You want a point? I've been making you look ridiculous each time you've put a reply out to me, hinting heavily that you should stop while you're ahead. Backpedalling, contradicting and now an attempted defense.....I've already told you what I'm getting out of this, and you keep playing into it, so don't expect an answer other than "read a previous comment".
|
