By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
archbrix on 14 January 2014
Edit Thread
Max King of the Wild said:
archbrix said:

No, fact are facts.  Deal with it.


Sony supported the PSP in 2010 along with Ps3. Sony transitioned in supporting Vita in 2011 and continued support for Ps3. Sony released the Ps4 with support while still releasing major ganes the same year for Ps3. Along with having a better online maintence and better post launch support its clear Sony is more productive than Nintendo with a fraction of the resource.

Truth bomb. #dealwithit

First, saying a "fraction of the resources" is wildly sensationalist.  Nintendo's internal employment number is closer to 5,000 than 7,000 which the other post stated.

Second, Sony's healthy support for PS3 in 2013 resulted in only two of their games for the launch of the PS4, which again goes to my point about supporting multiple platforms.

Furthermore, any logical person can deduce that Nintendo is being hit with the transition to HD, something that Sony has already gone through years ago.

I've often said that Nintendo could be more productive, but the issue here is that you have a hard time accepting that 3DS has been the focus for them and the sales reflect that.  Facts are still facts, which you seem to struggle with, and you have an incessant need to argue points even in the face of them just to attempt to come out on top.  Is it some need of fulfillment on your part?  Or is it just a slow day at Target?