Seriously, Nintendo is not THAT Important

[Pristine20]

seiya19 said:

Pristine20 said:
The playstation platform has always had lots of niche titles that wouldn't get noticed on nintendo systems either and somehow, you dismiss it as catering to dudebros? Does the likes of Valkyria chronicles, Disgaea, MGS4 and dragon's crown cater to dudebros? or even a first party title like The Last of Us?

curl-6's argument refers to the things Sony and Microsoft focus on as 1st party publishers and the way they present their platforms, not about the overall lineup available within them. Bringing up 3rd party games here makes no sense, as these are neither developed nor published by them. It's like if you were to bring up Tatsunoko VS Capcom, Red Steel, Madworld and Muramasa: The Demon Blade as examples of Nintendo's output...

Also, the idea that somehow niche games can't get noticed on Nintendo platforms has no basis in reality... There's plenty of games that prove the opposite, like No More Heroes, Ace Attorney, Castlevania, Shin Megami Tensei, Trauma Center, Scribblenauts, Love Plus, Bravely Default, Senran Kagura, Harvest Moon, Rune Factory, etc.

I will agree on MS part because the xbox one presentation emphasized sports, TV and COD but Sony's PS4 reveal was richer than that and you guys know it. You're the one with the wrong perception.

We can discount those ones I listed besides  TLOU. How about Heavenly Sword, Lair (I know it sucked), Genji, Folklore (they made a big deal about this one), Siren, Demon's souls (it was published by Sony), etc

See this list and tell me sony caters to dudebros again

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_video_games_published_by_Sony_Computer_Entertainment#PlayStation_3

Most of the games on your list aren't nintendo games either which kind of proves the point that they are not that important as those games would easily go elsewhere.