By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Samus Aran on 12 January 2014
Edit Thread
DerNebel said:
Samus Aran said:
lucidium said:
Samus Aran said:

Lol, how on earth could you miss my point?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fm8qqLT7FpU

Here's a hint. 

So your point is to say "a long standing successful franchise is better than a poorly made spin off" and that somehow universally addresses the topic of third party support and the GOOD first party titles?. Right.


Geez. Here's another hint: compare the character roster of both games. 

Wow, so now we're comparing first party quality and third party support by comparing the size (?) of the character rosters of a game and it's clone?

Why don't I ask you another fun question then? Since we're talking about current support here, why don't you tell me how many Smash characters are less than 10 years old?

No, we're comparing Sony's first party roster versus Nintendo's. I thought it was rather obvious, but apparently some people here need everything spelled out to them. 

What does it matter if the characters are old? Most of them are still relevant today. If anything, it's impressive that these characters have survived for so long in a chaotic industry. 

Compare Mario to Crash Bandicoot and Sonic nowadays. It's all about quality: that's why all of them are older than 10 years. Crappy characters don't last that long! 

Anyway, if you want a new Nintendo IP, I'll be glad to tell you Miyamoto is making one.