Seriously, Nintendo is not THAT Important

[TornadoCreator]

lucidium said:

Samus Aran said:

Yeah, as proven by Sony All Stars Battle Royale. 

LOL.

I can buy most third party games of Sony's consoles on my pc by the way. I really have no need for an XBOX360/PS3. I'd rate Playstation over XBOX though. 

All Stars Battle Royale outsold Pikmin 3, despite being a pile of garbage.

TornadoCreator said:

The ironic part being that many of those franchises are better outside of Sony. Metal Gear Solid had it's definitive version on the GameCube, GTA: Vice City and GTA: San Andreas had better graphics and ran smoother on the original Xbox. Tomb Raider ran far better on PC. Really it's only Final Fantasy, and even that is better on PC now, with the definitive version of FF7 on Steam (they finally fixed the calculation errors with the magic and spirit stats on that version).

To copy your FF7 route, GTA:VC and GTA:SA both looked and ran better on PC.

To then take your route and smack you in the face with it, every damn game from Wii era and earlier runs on PC and looks better in the process regardless of genre so clearly according to you, because it looks and runs better on a PC via emulation, Sony and Nintendo and by and large a waste of time and we should instead simply be using emulators instead of consoles.

You like boiling peoples points down to something no longer representing their position then strawmanning them in order to drive it to the point of absurdity. Sure, what I said wasn't effectively a casual statement amounting to "look these games are on loads of different platforms and often they're superior there, here are some examples", but it was "rah rah, PC can do everything, emulators for the win", wasn't it.

Why don't you just fuck off instead of trying to push people into an argument with what is clearly trolling. It's sad and wastes everyones time.

 

User was warned for this post.

yo_john117