Seriously, Nintendo is not THAT Important

[Samus Aran]

Kyuu said:

TornadoCreator said:

seiya19 said:

Numbers don't lie. Nintendo has, so far, being far more successful than Sony when it comes to 1st party software. And it's no secret that the success of Playstation platforms has historically got a lot to do with 3rd party support. Franchises like Final Fantasy, Metal Gear Solid, GTA, Tekken, and Tomb Raider, for example, which Sony fans themselves associate with the brand, for better or worse.

The ironic part being that many of those franchises are better outside of Sony. Metal Gear Solid had it's definitive version on the GameCube, GTA: Vice City and GTA: San Andreas had better graphics and ran smoother on the original Xbox. Tomb Raider ran far better on PC. Really it's only Final Fantasy, and even that is better on PC now, with the definitive version of FF7 on Steam (they finally fixed the calculation errors with the magic and spirit stats on that version).

"MGS had its definitive version on gamecube" LOL!!! That version you're talking about might be the most hated remake out there! it's not even directed by Hideo Kojima yet you call it definitive?! And who cares if Final Fantasy 7 came out on Steam a couple of decades after the original release??

Sony is easily the best in third party titles and even their first party studios are pretty comparable to Nintendo.

Yeah, as proven by Sony All Stars Battle Royale. 

LOL.

I can buy most third party games of Sony's consoles on my pc by the way. I really have no need for an XBOX360/PS3. I'd rate Playstation over XBOX though.