Seriously, Nintendo is not THAT Important

[Jizz_Beard_thePirate]

Mythmaker1 said:

Jizz_Beard_thePirate said:

Can we also admit that Sony isn't important either? If so, I agree that both companies aren't important since Sony can be easily replaced by Samsung in many departments

But obviously no one else is gonna agree to that so I disagree

I'm actually not that familiar with Sony hardware, but the retail electronics game is pretty competitive, so I don't doubt it.

In terms of the industry as a whole, I definitely agree both aren't that important.

Well, Samsung has enough money to just go buy the gaming companies they need if they really want to get into gaming... Their net income is 30 billion dollars (as a whole company) for gods sakes (if wiki is true that is) vs Sony's is 458 million (as a whole company according to wiki)

And I think Nintendo is more important than Sony in terms of gaming so if Sony goes down and Nintendo stays alive, Couldn't care less since Sony is not THAT important imo