crissindahouse said:
You should make a comic about how Sony wants people to pay to play online now. That would make more sense because if their huge increase in PS+ subscriptions shows us something then that most people didn't give a damn about PS+ and only pay for it now because they have to if they want to play online.
Sony does pretty much what Microsoft already did with Xbox, they force a huge amount of gamers to pay to play online. All the stuff the gamers don't want to pay for like the "free games" doesn't really make it better if you don't want it. But yeah, Microsoft was evil because of that and Sony isn't in many peoples opinion. I mean, they could throw games worth 500 bucks a week on people, if they only want to play online why exactly do they have to pay for that if that was so bad from Microsoft?
PS Now is right now not really comparable with what Microsoft wanted to do as long as you still have the chance to buy retail copies and as long as youhave the possibility to play them always offline as long as it is singleplayer game.
Could be different in maybe 10-15 years if Sony would release games only as PS Now games but as long as they don't do it you can't really complain about it.
|
So much wrong, a part of selling a product is making a good value proposition to the consumer. Sony did a way betetr job then MS transitioning users yo paying fro onlone by making plus an laready good service. Sony did a great job making the transition seamless by giving people value, and yet stil most of ps4's offering s are not hidden behind a paywall.
Don't blame sony fans for MS doing a worse job a product branding and providing value. This month alone i got borderlands 2, Devil may cry, and infinite free..........................
