By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Legend11 said:

I have a question for the people here who really like the idea of Playstation Now.

What if Microsoft had unveiled Xbox One as a service instead of a console. You basically could play Xbox One games on many different devices and it required an internet connection and a subscription. You would not have any kind of ownership rights for games but instead would completely lose access to them if your subscription lapsed. What would your reaction to that have been?


Positive, but wouldn't sign because I don't like ms first parties so i would have to buy a ps4 anyway. And even as a sony product i'll need to see more because i  like ownership and being able to play even after the service finish. Ps+ i see as an extensive rent for small price so it's good, i doubt ps now will be as cheap, so probably won't use.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."