By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
TornadoCreator said:
Kane1389 said:
TornadoCreator said:
Great article, had a bit of a giggle at it; though part of me is sad that the Wii U didn't suddenly sell 5m units overnight as I'd love it to succeed. Something needs to challenge Sony dominance this generation, and considering Microsoft is coming up with new and inventive ways to shit itself publicly, I don't expect MS to step up to the plate any time soon.


Sony's monopoly would be the least harmful monopoly for the industry. 


I wouldn't be so sure. I firmly believe the PS3 is only as good as it is, with some of the best exclusives on the market, because it was in third place for most of the generation and had something to prove. Any company with a clear market dominance will become complacent and anti-consumer greed will start to creep in. I hope Sony doesn't disappoint me, but I expect to be very pissed off with them at least once over the next few years.

During sony monopoly ps1 and ps2 sold for small price with profit, during ps3 Sony in 3rd big price and at loss recovering marketshare medium price and small  profit or loss... Which sony is better? I preffer the one dominating.

And on the medula anyone with highschool should know at least it's a part of the body. But some people doesn't want to study.





duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."