sales2099 said:
No from years of forum dwelling committed to memory :) Your second line just opened a can of worms. Who are you to say how serious I am based on what I own? So only people with a lot of disposable income/time on their hands deserve such a title? If so, that sounds like a title I wouldn't be proud of. What if say, some lead busy lives and only have the time and money dedicated for fun to be on one gaming device that caters to their interests the most? 360 had many of the past gens biggest games, so I could and was a serious gamer in the last several years. Xbox 360 as a single console had it all: huge digital library, multiplats, Xbox exclsuives, but also the famous (or infamous) 360/PC games. This doesn't require me or others to buy a PC gaming rig. I can say I have had little desire to game elsewhere last gen because 360 covered all bases pretty well. Now ask a gamer who prefers PS3, and you will find it rare that they just used a PS3. Huh.....look at that. You are a all-around gamer so you are not part of the mix. |
My serious gaming is on PS platforms... but when outside I may play on a friend Wii, or on my PSVita, some idiotic game on Xperia S, etc... don't game on computer or Xbox, but don't know how playing in just one plat would make your choice better than others...
And if you say you just have time or money to play on one plat and you choose Xbox no one will laugh at you, but saying that just because you do it and others may play on PS and PC them PS isn't good is moronic.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







