Normchacho on 08 January 2014
bugrimmar said:
Normchacho said:
Jesus guy, you asked why it was different than Onlive and he told you.
1. Games: He is saying that because Sony has such a large games library and has good relationships with other publishers the chances that it will have a good library are alot better. Seeing as how the games they have announced are pretty desirable games it's a good inditacor of things to come.
2. He is saying that it is less likely that Sony will fail than ONlive because they have the resources and have had the time to make sure it works. Which if the first impressions are anything to go by (along with impressions of Gaikai) than it works and will only continue to improve as the infastructure is built up.
3. He was saying that the tech for streaming games has improved and that they are probably not using the old OUTDATED tech that Onlive uses. BD might be old but it isn't outdated.
4. The info we do have it promising so it looks like the service will be really cool. We have more reason to be positive about PSNow than we do to be negative.
He made perfect sense, don't be such a tool.
|
How are pure 100% assumptions perfect sense? Using assumptions is the exact opposite. It's nonsense.
Anyway I've let go of this argument. Moving on..
|
Just like your assumption that it's the same?
Bet with Adamblaziken:
I bet that on launch the Nintendo Switch will have no built in in-game voice chat. He bets that it will. The winner gets six months of avatar control over the other user.