| Kresnik said: I've had all day to think about this since I read it this morning but haven't had a proper amount of time to sit down on VGChartz today. Not that big a deal. I've had a fantastic time playing Killzone Mercenary on Vita (4v4 multi-player) and it works because the maps are designed for it, which is fine. I just think I was a bit taken a-back by it because of all the hype it's received. Particular Selnor. I'm sure he means no harm but when he talks about something like this at every opportunity and brings it up in thread which have nothing to do with it (mentioning it in an Evolve thread -_-) you kind of expect it to be the bees knees to receive that kind of praise. And I'm sure it'll work great as a game, with some limitations just like every other game. It's not the messiah; it's a very naughty boy solid game. |
well the game very well may be great, and 6 vs 6 in way does say it will be bad. however, it is kind of a dissapointment because its an online only game after all, and you would like to have options and variety. personally, i believe respawn when they said 6vs6 is the most balanced. but i also feel that the game could have been great if it had large scale battles. sometimes having choas and madness all around could be awesome, sometimes it could be really bad and just unfun. but the dissapointment comes from knowing you dont even have the latter as an option. whoever says having just 6vs6 than more options is just deluding themself. imo in online shooters its always better to have more options and variety.
@bolded: it looks like it is, but we cant be sure until its out. even if its already taken the crown for GOTG 
