By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
jacks81x said:
bugrimmar said:
jacks81x said:

You're asking our opinions on why Playstation.Now is a big deal to us.  I gave you my opinions.  I'm not an insider.  I don't know all the details about the service.  I can only speak for myself why I think it's a big deal.  I don't speak for you and I don't speak for anyone else here.  If you think that it's going to be exactly the same as OnLive, you're more than welcome to.  I don't agree with you, but I'm also not here to convince you.  It's not out for another 6 months.  No one here knows exactly  what the final product will be like.  And that I can say it's a FACT.   Either way, we'll find out in time. 


Exactly. That means, you admit, that all the things you said are your opinions, and therefore your assumptions.

So I just find it funny that you put "Fact" in front of all your points in response to mine, when you already know that you know nothing about this service as well.

"No one here knows exactly  what the final product will be like.  And that I can say it's a FACT." --> So that further reinforces the fact that your points were indeed assumptions, since you don't know anything about the product, right?

 

Anyway, it's good we've established together that you're just full of assumptions. moving on..

Well not really.  The ones that I did put as facts are facts.  We know those 4 games were announced at CES yesterday.  We know Sony have failed and succeeded with various ventures in the past.  We know BD is still the standard medium for HD.  And we know that Sony hasn't released all the details on the service.

But yes, moving on...


And how are those "facts" relevant to my question - how is Playstation Now different from Onlive? They aren't relevant at all.

1. 4 games = useless info.

2. Sony has failed and succeeded = useless info. The fact that they have failed counters your entire argument in the first place.

3. BD is the standard medium = useless info. So what? I was merely pointing out that Sony is more than willing to use old technology.

4. Sony hasn't released all the details = correct, but that counters your entire argument, stating that Playstation Now is going to be great, since YOU DON'T KNOW THE DETAILS.

Seriously, you're like a machine going round and round in circles. A little logic would be nice from time to time yknow? Nevermind. Sorry I responded again, I just couldn't help needing to clarify your intense error in judgment. I'll stop now.