fordy said:
you're saying PS+ never happened? That opened a few doors to begin with. Like I mentioned before, the one thing that could be stopping it is internet latency, and there has been major pushes lately by both governments and corporations to resolve this... Now on the other hand, if they've managed to get it working on PS3 (with the same amount of input and screen resolution as PS4), what do you think is stopping them from utilising it to PS4. In fact, I'd venture to say that PS4 would be more likely to end up cloud based due to the fact that Sony moved to the x86/x64 arcitecture. You know...the architecture that has had more money invested in effective/efficient virtualisation techniques than any other? |
If you really believe it explain why Sony and MS released PS4 and Xbone??? PS360 can run stream (look at netflix), so by your logic they could run PS4 games... since tablets will be able to do it as well.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







