| BMaker11 said: even though in the grand scheme of things, a statistician would say the values are the "same" and ignore the difference, since samplings are statistically insignificant at +/- 0.5%; 3.01 is higher than 2.9, and if you don't unequivocally accept the higher number over the statistically insignificant lower number, you're just flaming the poor old XBone because you're a biased Sony fan. Obviously. |
Of course 3>2.9, but my point is that it doesn't matter.
VGCs rounded down 2.9 is just as accurate as MSs 'more than 3m'.
The only point anyone should get out of any of this is that Xbone sold about 3m.
I'm not saying its good or bad (its actually just fine). The couple months just after launch are not as big of an indicator of anything anyways. Kinda why my comparison thread goes to the end of the 2nd xmas.
.... or obviously I'm just a flaming sony fan.
