| Trunkin said: 60fps. I'm starting to see that 30fps kinda looks like sh.... |
You should try out 120/144 fps some time, you would probably think of 60fps as "meh".
When I first tried out a 120hz monitor years ago, I spent probably half an hour just moving stuff around on the desktop because it was so silky smooth.
| disolitude said:
At these resolutions gaming becomes a game of trade-offs. Do I want full rez and 60 fps (or even 120)? Well I have to lower the game details and AA. Do I want all details and AA turned on? I may lower the resolution to do so... Does anyone ever want a dipping stuttering frame rate? No they dont... So don't give me the BS that variable frame rate is an OK tradeoff as long as resolution and details are high. |
Pretty much.
However, the advantage the PC has is you can just throw more hardware at the performance problem.
You could achieve 120fps with everything on max in most games if you wen't with 3-4x Titans or Radeon 290's.
Basically, if you are willing to spend the cash, you can have zero compromises, where-as with consoles you are given what you get, regardless if you like it or not.
Besides on the PC, todays demanding game is essentially tomorrows solitair.

www.youtube.com/@Pemalite








