By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Lawlight said:
2000 data points for worldwide numbers? Well, that would expect that big inaccuracies.

If we assume a reasonably unbiased sampling for those 2000 data points, then you would expect a margin of error at 95% confidence of 2.2%, assuming an infinite population. Smaller for the real population. That is, 95% of the time you would expect the random sample's mean to be within 2.2% of the real mean.

Seriously, if you don't understand basic statistics, don't get involved in this discussion, you're in over your head.