adriane23 said:
|
I'm going to have to ape this sentiment. This is coming from someone who's played through EVERY game console generation launch.
When I think back to the games that I initially played on each console (when purchased near or upon release), there are far too many stinkers that I couldn't be paid to play had they been released later in the generation.
When I look back upon the 8th gen in 5-6 years and I think Killzone SF was the equivalent of Resistance, or that Battlefield 4 or Assassin's Creed 4 were games that weren't worth playing on account of being games one buys just to have something to play on a new console, will be the only time I'll be able to believe otherwise. I'm fairly certain I'll still be playing the occasional games of Resogun years from now. I still find myself playing the occasional game of Super Stardust HD (same game studio) and that was my first PSN Store purchase back in early 2007.
The only thing the 8th gen has going against it is the fact that many of the best titles available on their respective platforms aren't just multiplatform games, they're multigenerational games (available on last gen hardware). But that doesn't make them worse games, it just means a new console isn't required to play them if the technicals of playing on better hardware with improved visuals aren't worth the extra cost of switching platforms.







