masschamber said:
1)so only rational you approve of is grounds to deny something? oh yeah and extreme leftist and communists are among the biggest Holocaust deniers, the important point is that you can't deny well documented history it contributes to the decay of society, the damage to society as a whole is the same behind denying the Holocaust and denying the moon landing. 2)The engineering, design, and manufacture of all space equipment was sub-contracted through private industry for design and construction, they own the patents not nasa, the military doesn't own the patent on military vehicles the designer does, the same applies to Nasa no matter who you are you can't just crack open the patent office to appease a nut, find a professional mechanical engineering, they'll be able to explain the amount that the space program has contributed to the advancement of engineering and industry as a result of the space program and in particular the moon landing. 3) the third comment I made is basically the same as denying the moon landing if your going to start just assuming something didn't happen, the same can be done to everything? 4)if someone is wrong they need to be called out on it not respected, that be like allowing an engineer to ignore the laws of physics when design something because its their opinion, Recent history is very concrete and it needs to be preserved and not made ambiguous and vague by respecting the opinions of conspiracy theorists with too much free time on thier hands |
1) Hmm not specifc rational, well documented where the proof is missing =:?
2) Possible :).
3) If people wants to believe in it why not?
4) Uhm one of the conditions to be a engineer is believing the law of physics... So in fact what you are saying is impossible You can't be a engineer if you don't believe in the law of physics :). Will the world change if people respect or don't respect Conspiracy theorists?







