| padib said: That's not it at all. The Intelligent Design community are simply not satisfied with an explanation to what they see as high intelligence by means of non-intelligent processes. They might not even be believers in God... To disregard the severe challenges to evolution is also non-scientific, so I would prefer go the way of looking into a framework that considers divinity in order to understand the past, rather than shun it, because odds are infinitely higher that the route that considers divinity will be more accurate. |
The problem is that the very logic you use to disregard intelligence stemming from non-intelligent processes is the very same logic that could be applied to any intelligent design theory. You can't suggest that intelligence must come from intelligen processes without also giving an explanation for the origin of the intelligent processes in the first place.
