| MTZehvor said
|
And lastly, no. No matter how many times you claim that DMC4 Dante was confirmed to be a different character, it doesn't make it true. We've been over this twice already. An old creator's head canon does not a different character make.
Reuben Langdon confirmed he was asked to play the character differently. Not to mention the creator of the series has confirmed the camp homo is not Dante. Just because you blindly accepted the camp homo as Dante, why do the orignal fans have to accept that imposter as Dante?
What you've just described is NOT a manual lock on system. You have described an automatic lock on system, in which you select a target in no other way besides relative position and movement.
You keep lying about the same point, 'realtive position' and 'movement'. You have nothing else to say because you can't explain to me how a system which gives full manual control to player is automatic. Explain to me camp homo fan scum, how is it possible for DmC to be automatic when the player has full control of what enemy they lock onto?
You keep saying relative position and movement because you have no way of answering this question. We both know your wrong. Hiding behind relative position and movement can't change that now.
"DmC has no lock on."
The words "button lock" are never included there. If you're going to misrepresent what someone says, don't actually put the quote you're misrepresenting directly above it.
I'm not misrepresenting anything. As I said many times now, DmC has a lock on, its integrated into the L3 stick, DmC does not have an automatic button lock like previous games. We know this is true as I've already explained; the L3 lock isolates a specific enemy, unlike the button lock of previous games which isolates an enemy based on the AI's decision, the player has less control of that decision as you already admitted; in contrast DmC gives the player full control.
That's how. I really don't know how I can make this any simpler for you.
You made it crystal clear when you put your foot in your mouth and admitted DMC4 was indeed automatic:
How are you MANUALLY selecting your target if the AI picks a target that it thinks you want to attack?
How are you MANUALLY selecting your target if the AI cycles through said targets until you reach the one you want?
Those are your own words, not mine; by your own admission DMC4 is an automatic system. I'm waiting for you explaination as to how an automatic system can be manual. I'm waiting camp homo fan!
The irony in this statement being the one who accuses me of low literacy levels can't even spell the word right.
The irony is that I haven't made an attack on someone's literacy, you have; yet you are incompitent in your own literacy ability. Way to put your foot in you mouth again camp homo fan.
Now, please, by all means. Explain why your silly definition of a "manual" lock on system should be accepted over the definition used by the head developer of DmC himself.
Tameem hasn't acutally said DmC is an automatic system, he said the lock on (the button lock) has been integrated into the control setup automatically. So you don't have to hold a button to access all your moves. He hasn't said anything about the system being automatically controlled. I suggest you pay attention to the facts next time, thinking dosen't seem to be your forte. This is evident in the fact that you didn't think to question of the decision of turning Dante into a camp homosexual. You blindly accepted it because you are an ignorant DMC4 fan, not a DMC fan. Just someone who blindly accepts something because you think as long as it has the same name it must be the same thing.
Your entire criticism of the manual lock on system is one that should be leveled just as much at DMC3.
It is, not to mention the restrictive camera angles of previous games. Capcom wanted to move the series forward, why should I accept you are more qualified than Hideaki Itsuno and Capcom Japan. I'm waiting!! Not to mention DMC3's lock on wasn't broken, DMC4's was. So thats another point in favour of the previous games over DMC4.
This entire thread has been you criticizing DMC4's mechanics, many of which were taken from previous titles.
I'm not just critcising DMC4's mechanics, I'm criticising everything about the game. Espeically how they butchered an icon by turning him into a camp homosexual. The point of DmC Dante is that he is relatable compared to the camp homo, who is not relatable at all. He's simply a retard who behaves nothing like the original character. DMC3 Dante did have moments where the player could emphathise with him, and he was younger, which is why he was less mature than the first game. Yet it makes no sense as to why DMC4 Donte, who is older, is less mature than when he was younger. Nor why he dress's like that, or why he makes homoerotic poses. Thats not Dante, its an insult to the orignal fans who didn't want the camp homo, or that Twilight shit, or Trish and Lady to be butchered as they were.
You've been calling yourself a "true" DMC fan this entire time...yet, quite honestly, I've seen nothing to suggest that you even remotely enjoyed the old DMC games.
Unfortunately for you I have Platinumed the HD collection, which not many fans came back to because of DMC4. I'm not here to prove whether I liked the previous games or not, I'm here defending the rights of the DMC community to prefer DmC because its a better game, and the rights of the developers to make the games they want to make. In terms of enjoyment, DMC1 is certainly the top for me, yet I understand how some fans can prefer DMC3 for its combat. DMC2 and DMC4 were below average games, depsite Nero's combat actually being the best in the series until DmC.
At this point, I do have to wonder if you're a fan of the original series at all, or just some passerby who played DmC first, and hasn't even been around the hack and slash genre long enough to know the difference between a manual and automatic lock on.
You must be getting desperate to make a comment like that. If I had no idea about the DMC series you woulnd't be here wasting your time, trying to prove something you think is true. Just because you think DMC4 is better because you liked it, dosen't mean anyone else has to accept it. Thats why you came into this thread in the first place. I however know your not here to tell the truth and to give an impartial view, your simply here to keep lying because you think DMC4 is a good game, thus you think that everyone has to see what you see. Unfortuantely it dosen't work like that. DMC4 was not a continuation of Devil May Cry, it was a reboot to feature Nero and Kyrie as the new main characters. Hence why the game was not very good. I see DMC4 for what it is, just because it has Devil May Cry on the box and is made in Japan, it dosen't mean we can't scrutinise the game for what it is.
Now that raises an interesting point... my trophies in DMC1,2,3 and DmC are there for anyone to see. If your a DMC fan as you claim, why not show me yours?
