| fireburn95 said: This gen had xbox's name written all over it. They dominated nearly every aspect yet somehow they are third - or close second. I'm not saying they failed this gen - far from, but how did they not dominate (of at least playstation) DA LIST (Feel free to add) of why xbox deserved to win! - They had captured a lot of Sony's exclusives! - Easier Hardware to work with - They had MULTIPLE IP's that sold in the multi-millions! Halo Fable Forza GOW. They didn't have many IP's that sold 1 or 2 million unlike quite a number of PS3's. - A universally accepted better controller. - They won the motion control war (against SONY, but hell, everyone lost that didn't they?) - They had exclusive deals with the BIG games (COD, Skyrim) - Minecraft for a year and a half before Sony - Strong(er?) marketing - More focus on products than Sony - Sitcoms and many other tv programmes, when they play games - it's 85% of the time (YES 85) xbox 360. Big Bang Theory with their Halo night, south park always said/had 360's, even Breaking Bad (Which is made by Sony Pictures) when Jesse is playing with that little kid. - Games almost always shown off on 360's at press events (or PC's with 360 controller, still brand recognition for xbox) - Cheaper price at launch compared to PS3 (599 US Dollahs! <3 KAZ) - They seemed to make exclusive deals with indie games that sold Mega! Minecraft, fez, mark of the ninja, super meat boy, braid.
MORE TO COME BRO!
But somehow they didn't dominate.... Any theories? |
A lot of these points come from an american perspective... Where they did come in first. I dont think a lot of them hold up in the worldwide market, which is why the 360 wasnt as successful. They have a great core business and focus here in the states, but they struggle in selling that business abroad...







