By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
joesampson on 21 December 2013
Edit Thread
SupBambiKing said:
joesampson said:
So much bullshit in this thread. First off the game is gorgeous. It runs at 900p not 720p, has no screen tearing or frame rate issues, and is the best looking console game I've ever seen.

Stopped reading there
Originally touted as a solid 30fps experience, Ryse misses the mark more often than we'd like with frame-rates often fluctuating between 26-28fps.

Digital Foundry - http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-ryse-son-of-rome
But of course you have more clue right?I mean if you say so!I mean Microsoft promised and Digital Foundry just hates on the game right?
Best looking game on NextGen right now is Killzone SF - You can't be best looking at anything if you run at low Res - NATIVE 1080p is the way to go especially as an Exclusive on a much more powerful hardware.
Ryse is maybe the best looking 900p Game on consoles but there probably the PS4 Version of Battlefield 4 is more impressive especially as a Multiplat.


I can't speak for killzone yet since I haven't picked it up, (I will soon) but ryse doesn't have a bad frame rate to my eyes. Like they said it stays between 26-28 fps and that's good enough for me. But you didn't read very carefully did you. I said it's the best looking console game I have seen. I also never said anything about knowing better than digital foundry. For me frame rate issues means that the game skips and stutters and hits really low frame rates. I said frame rate issues, not that it had super high frame rates. 

Please read again and don't put words in my mouth. I was simply correcting the bullshit others said in this thread. 

It's also sad that you immediately attack me as if I am a Microsoft fanboy without a clue that I'm a fan of both play station and xbox. Is this what gamers have become? Angry, snappy gamers that can't allow someone to compliment a game they enjoyed?