-CraZed- on 20 December 2013
| Brutalyst said: Not to try and sound like im being a prick to you... But when the games show a difference I will start to care, and not an extra 2 or 3 frames. Im just tired of all these threads appearing which are nothing more than 1-up manship based on nothing more that hypothesis... They PS3 was supposed to be more powerful than the 360 and look how that turned out. It didnt make a difference, and most the multi-platform games performed or looked better on the so-called 'less powerful' machine. Dont get me wrong, I love my PS3, and love my PS4 and all my other Sony devices, im just tired of all these threads, at least wait until one of the consoles proves it has an edge over the other. |
While you make a valid point in sofar that it really only matters if it is leveraged in the games themselves. Your PS3 vs 360 argument is invalid here.
The PS3 and 360 were as different as two consoles can be in their architecture and the PS3 was not used properly bt third party devs because it was harder to do so AND they eventually realized they could achieve near/direct parity between the two systems without putting in the extra work required by the PS3. Not only does this fact counter any direct comparison between last gen and this gen on this matter, it also speaks to the PS3s ability to rival 360 games with considerable amounts of processing power tied behind it's back.
