By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
fatslob-:O said:
Soleron said:
fatslob-:O said:
Soleron said:
That's one benchmark, and it's not even relevant to a normal mix of game workloads.

You'll need far more evidence than that.

Games are mostly GPU limited so there's almost no point in placing high importance on awful jaguar cores. 

I mean, if you want to decide which CPU is better.

Not saying that's a useful question.

The core configurations from the PS4 and X1 are identical for the most. It`s just that PS4 is likely clocked around 16% higher I presume. That makes the PS4`s CPU part clocked at around 2 Ghz while the X1 was reported to be about 1.75 from major nelson. 

In summary the CPU part in both consoles are identical, it`s just that one is clocked higher than the other so I assume that the PS4s CPU is better.

Note: I will interpret that this test was done using all 8 cores. 


According to the article the graph is only for 1 CPU.



GAMING is not about spending hours to pass/waste our time just for fun,

its a Feeling/Experience about a VIRTUAL WORLD we can never be in real, and realizing some of our dreams (also creating new ones).

So, Feel Emotions, Experience Adventure/Action, Challenge Game, Solve puzzles and Have fun.

PlayStation is about all-round "New experiences" using new IP's to provide great diversity for everyone.

Xbox is always about Online and Shooting.

Nintendo is always about Fun games and milking IP's.