BeElite said:
You assume just casue Ea has low digital sales, GT would also. You assume most have low broadband (even though you dont) you assue 15gb is to much to choose digital for most. Your point of view is based on assumptions, you assume Vg innital numbers are correct even though just the week prior they were 40% wrong. And have already adjusted GT6 numbers up once. You lack consistent arguement and you flip flop to whatever side supports your feeling. Your posts are riddled with hypocracy, you base your opinion of vg numbers yet when i use em to show digital you flip agianst them. What games final sales has VG under/over tracked by 30% that have no digital version ? Dont just assume Prove they have. To show that my extrapolation of digital sales by comparing vg and PD numbers is flawerd you must prove large release like GT with no digital version has been undertracked by 30% thus showing my fallancy. Should be easy nuf just show the sales numbers.
|
And if someone believe 15Gb is too much for a digital game how can PS+ be such a sucess, MS go cloud and digital sales crazy and Sony invest in Gaikai?
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."