By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
TheJimbo1234 said:
...

What I am implying though is if someone presumed that the sky was pink due to a "pinkon" particle that they believed existed as it fitted neatly into their equation. Of course though, no such thing is real and this is what many theoretical quantum physicists have most likely done - made neat little mathematically sound packages to fit into their equation as currently they can not discover what is meant to be there, but merely guess.

Yes.

There's a large gap between "X is consistent with what we know right now", and "There's good evidence for X". Popular science often gets the two confused.