S.T.A.G.E. said:
Einsam_Delphin said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Einsam_Delphin said:
But they didn't advertise it. Why would they advertise something they're not selling, that even if they did sell, no one would buy. It's just a tech demo. You only have yourself to blame for thinking anything more of it.
And are you really trying to say that this game is somehow a bad thing? I only see nothing but positives here. It shows Nintendo is still trying to keep it's 3rd party relations positive, it's another game for the Wii U, Zelda series finally does something different from the usual action/adventure, and Zelda will gain more interest from Japan while Dynasty Warriors gains more from the West. Everybody wins! |
Um...that was an advertisement for what Zelda would truly look like. Its just in the art style of Twilight Princess powered by the Wii U tech. That game is not technically demanding. It's old news that that is very possible for the Wii U.
Watch this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAmKqtAu-hY
You can take it as what you will but I find the GC era to be one of the darker times for Nintendo. The Wii U is ,mirroring it in spades.
|
Sorry I just assumed the video was of the tech demo (although from what you said it sounds like it is...). I can't actually watch any videos atm.
As for your last sentence, that has nothing to do Hyrule Warriors. |
Doing stupid shit like this is going to lower peoples anticipation of Zelda. Look at how putting spinoffs into the fold lowered demand for Halo. If Nintendo (think about this) is depending on Tecmo Koei to make games for them they've seriously become desperate. Tecmo Koei was decent company a decade ago.
|
Aha! So you are trying to spin this negatively! No surprise there! xD
If you really believe spin-offs and collaborations qualify as stupid shit, even after I've explained how that's far from the truth, then there's nothing more to discuss here.
